Creature discrepancies

Kalah · Unread postby **Kalah** » 27 Apr 2006, 12:41

I just discovered a discrepancy between the Demo and the offial site's creature encyclopedia. In the Demo, the Familiars are the base creature, and Imps are their upgrades. In the encyclopedia, however, the roles are reversed. Familiars are now the upgrade.

Also, the demo Squires are referred to as Knights. They are the upgrade of Squires, which in the Demo were the Footmen. The Conscripts are called Militia Guards, and the Succubus Mistress is Succubus Favourite.

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 27 Apr 2006, 12:50

Well familiars have been the upgrade in HIII,and imps were the base in HIV,so Id think that in HV familiars will be the upgrade again.

Orfinn · Unread postby **Orfinn** » 27 Apr 2006, 12:56

Yeah its a bit confusing, but at least the names have been dealt with. We just have to play the full version to see the reults of the names.
i think Footman--Squire is good enough, I mean Knights are riding on horses but of course Crusader could be a good name instead of Squire, since religion are a mian factor in HV. Paladin wouldnt fit good, neither Templar since them both are way more powerful than to be placed as 3rd lvl units!

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 27 Apr 2006, 13:07

Why are Templars too powerful? Thay all got killed pretty easy in the Middle Ages.

And Squires are more like glorified weapon-bearers, and they're supposed to learn to fight from the knight, so they're not fighters yet. '

Until we see them in the final game the names aren't final. And that encyclopedia wasn't been modified since it first appeared.

Ethric · Unread postby **Ethric** » 27 Apr 2006, 13:21

Yeah these things change along the way. The release of the game will set it all to rest

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 27 Apr 2006, 13:28

If Hell Charger and Grim Raider are in somebody will be "laid to rest" for sure...

Orfinn · Unread postby **Orfinn** » 27 Apr 2006, 13:31

You dont have a sense of humour do you?

Gljivko a.k.a Vortex · Unread postby **Gljivko a.k.a Vortex** » 27 Apr 2006, 13:34

Kalah wrote: Also, the demo Squires are referred to as Knights. They are the upgrade of Squires, which in the Demo were the Footmen. The Conscripts are called Militia Guards, and the Succubus Mistress is Succubus Favourite.

IIRC I think the names in encyclopedia are the old names from beta version.

Ethric · Unread postby **Ethric** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:14

ThunderTitan wrote:If Hell Charger and Grim Raider are in somebody will be "laid to rest" for sure...

But but but... it's a Charger... FROM HELL!!! And a Raider... who IS GRIM!!!111!!! Surely the names couldn't be more fitting

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:18

Orfinn wrote:You don't have a sense of humour do you?

There's a difference between funny and retarded.

BenchBreaker · Unread postby **BenchBreaker** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:21

don't you get it? hell charger is the upgrade of the basilisk! it goes like this:

basilisk -> basilisk charger -> battery charger -> hell charger

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:21

ThunderTitan wrote:
Orfinn wrote:You don't have a sense of humour do you?
There's a difference between funny and retarded.

Or is there?

Oh,I guess there is

BenchBreaker · Unread postby **BenchBreaker** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:26

Orfinn wrote:Yeah its a bit confusing, but at least the names have been dealt with. We just have to play the full version to see the reults of the names.
i think Footman--Squire is good enough, I mean Knights are riding on horses but of course Crusader could be a good name instead of Squire, since religion are a mian factor in HV. Paladin wouldnt fit good, neither Templar since them both are way more powerful than to be placed as 3rd lvl units!

i can't see the squire as the upgrade of anything, why don't we just stick with the good old swordsman:

footman -> swordsman

perfect!

Orfinn · Unread postby **Orfinn** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:40

Neuuu because the footman also use a sword, its too obvious.

BenchBreaker · Unread postby **BenchBreaker** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:44

Orfinn wrote:Neuuu because the footman also use a sword, its too obvious.

ok how about swordsman -> swordmaster from h2?

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 27 Apr 2006, 14:50

Why not swordman juggler -> swordman dancer?It sounds sooooo cool!

BenchBreaker · Unread postby **BenchBreaker** » 27 Apr 2006, 15:01

DaemianLucifer wrote:Why not swordman juggler -> swordman dancer?It sounds sooooo cool!

oh man! why didn't i think of that

Ethric · Unread postby **Ethric** » 27 Apr 2006, 15:02

BenchBreaker wrote: ok how about swordsman -> swordmaster from h2?

Swordsman -> Master Swordsman

Kalah · Unread postby **Kalah** » 27 Apr 2006, 16:26

This is not the "silly names topic".

I swear, the spammers will ruin this forum...

The Heroes Round Table

Creature discrepancies

Creature discrepancies

Re: Creature discrepancies

Who is online