Game: Caladont

Light-hearted discussions, forum games and anything that doesn't fit into the other forums.
Tech Corner - Firewalls, AV etc. - Report Bugs - Board Rules
User avatar
DaemianLucifer
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 11282
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: City 17

Unread postby DaemianLucifer » 31 Jul 2006, 20:32

smithereens

As for ionic,ionization,yes,those are two different words,both acceptable.In fact,I think both were used in round 3.

Words used:
Gyttja,jaded,dedication,ionization,onerous,singer,ingerminate,nates,testudo,tudor,
dormitory,toryism,smithereens

Preliminary score:
Corribus - 7
soupnazii - 7
DaemianLucifer - 5
eekstah - 4
Gaidal Cain - 4
urbanmonk - 4
Phobos - 3
theGryphon - 3
vaudy - 2
Last edited by DaemianLucifer on 31 Jul 2006, 20:48, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Paulus1
Archlich
Archlich
Posts: 1128
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Odense, Denmark

Unread postby Paulus1 » 31 Jul 2006, 20:35

ryegrass

whole word used :D
and opened the field for next person...

User avatar
DaemianLucifer
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 11282
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: City 17

Unread postby DaemianLucifer » 31 Jul 2006, 20:42

Sorry paulus,but GC was faster then me.Though the mighty edit spell rules :devil:

User avatar
Corribus
Round Table Knight
Round Table Knight
Posts: 4994
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: The Duchy of Xicmox IV

Unread postby Corribus » 31 Jul 2006, 20:43

I'm guessing Paulus1 was late, so following DL's Smithereens:

ensured
"What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?" - Richard P. Feynman

User avatar
Gaidal Cain
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 6972
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Location: Solna

Unread postby Gaidal Cain » 31 Jul 2006, 20:48

DL: check my comment about the word Tudor. AFAIK, it's always used as a proper name (least obvious is in uses as a "Tudor house").
You don't want to make enemies in Nuclear Engineering. -- T. Pratchett

User avatar
Kalah
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 20078
Joined: 24 Nov 2005

Unread postby Kalah » 31 Jul 2006, 20:50

redactor

Tudor can also be an adjective relating to a style of architecture in England in the 15th century.
Last edited by Anonymous on 31 Jul 2006, 20:51, edited 1 time in total.
In War: Resolution, In Defeat: Defiance, In Victory: Magnanimity, In Peace: Goodwill.

User avatar
DaemianLucifer
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 11282
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: City 17

Unread postby DaemianLucifer » 31 Jul 2006, 20:50

Gaidal Cain wrote:DL: check my comment about the word Tudor. AFAIK, it's always used as a proper name (least obvious is in uses as a "Tudor house").
I already did.And it seems it can be used as a style of dress as well,so its acceptable.

User avatar
Gaidal Cain
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 6972
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Location: Solna

Unread postby Gaidal Cain » 31 Jul 2006, 21:26

The Free Dictonary wrote:Adj. 1. Tudor - of or relating to a style of architecture in England in the 15th century; "half-timbered Tudor houses"; "Tudor furniture"
Merriam-Webster wrote:Main Entry: Tu·dor
Pronunciation: 'tü-d&r, 'tyü-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Henry Tudor (Henry VII of England)
1 : of or relating to the English royal house that ruled from 1485 to 1603
2 : of, relating to, or characteristic of the Tudor period
- Tudor noun
Wikipedia on adjective wrote: Adjectival use of nouns

English (like some other Germanic languages) is unusual in that it allows nouns to be used adjectivally (i.e., in function they are "adjectives", in structure they are nouns), as in

a Georgia peach

or

his farewell letter.

In other languages, some sort of grammatical functor between the two nouns may be required.

These attributive nouns are not classed as adjectives, and they cannot be used in post-position; while the majority of adjectives can function both attributively and predicatively, an attributive noun cannot be made predicative by simply putting it after the head word.
It's still a noun, it's just used as an adjective (which the English language permits).
You don't want to make enemies in Nuclear Engineering. -- T. Pratchett

User avatar
theGryphon
Spectre
Spectre
Posts: 716
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby theGryphon » 31 Jul 2006, 21:42

actors
I believe in science and that science can explain everything.
Because God has made it all work in such a beautiful way...

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 31 Jul 2006, 21:46

DaemianLucifer wrote:I already did.And it seems it can be used as a style of dress as well,so its acceptable.
So we're allowed to use Versace or Calvin Klein?!

torso
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image

User avatar
Gaidal Cain
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 6972
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Location: Solna

Unread postby Gaidal Cain » 31 Jul 2006, 21:53

torsor
You don't want to make enemies in Nuclear Engineering. -- T. Pratchett

User avatar
theLuckyDragon
Round Table Knight
Round Table Knight
Posts: 4883
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby theLuckyDragon » 31 Jul 2006, 22:00

orbital
"Not all those who wander are lost." -- JRRT

User avatar
Kalah
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 20078
Joined: 24 Nov 2005

Unread postby Kalah » 31 Jul 2006, 22:01

italicise
In War: Resolution, In Defeat: Defiance, In Victory: Magnanimity, In Peace: Goodwill.

User avatar
theGryphon
Spectre
Spectre
Posts: 716
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby theGryphon » 31 Jul 2006, 22:08

Btw, why was "a tergo" not valid? It appears in my Random House Webster's dictionary. Then, for example, is "a priori" not valid either?
I believe in science and that science can explain everything.
Because God has made it all work in such a beautiful way...

User avatar
eekstah
Scout
Scout
Posts: 187
Joined: 12 Apr 2006

Unread postby eekstah » 31 Jul 2006, 22:09

Ciselure

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 31 Jul 2006, 22:14

theGryphon wrote:Btw, why was "a tergo" not valid? It appears in my Random House Webster's dictionary. Then, for example, is "a priori" not valid either?
Because they're 2 words?!
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image

User avatar
theGryphon
Spectre
Spectre
Posts: 716
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby theGryphon » 31 Jul 2006, 22:23

lurer

Edit: So it's OK if you put a dash in between, like good-looking, but this way not OK. Yet, words like "a priori" that come from Latin are treated (and used) as single words, jsyk...
I believe in science and that science can explain everything.
Because God has made it all work in such a beautiful way...

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 31 Jul 2006, 22:30

You can always write apriori in 1 word.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image

User avatar
theGryphon
Spectre
Spectre
Posts: 716
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby theGryphon » 31 Jul 2006, 22:38

THAT would be wrong!
I believe in science and that science can explain everything.
Because God has made it all work in such a beautiful way...

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 31 Jul 2006, 23:04

theGryphon wrote:THAT would be wrong!
Give it a few more decades.

ergonomic
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image


Return to “Campfire”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests