data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48b6f/48b6fb37d585193ad856192588f295f6b7b1f1c9" alt="Image"
www.youtube.com/embed/Ue2EvW-0oTU?rel=0
Read full article...
I wonder how much the rights would be worth today, compared to the US$1.3 million of 2003.Dalai wrote:JVC says he would like to buy out the IP, given a chance.
Maybe. Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it; if Ubisoft decide to drop the entire franchise they have no need of it anymore and may be likely to accept a fairly low amount of money, as anything is better than zero. But I guess we should hope JVC is successful enough to get enough money to buy it, however much may be needed.Angelspit wrote:I wonder how much the rights would be worth today, compared to the US$1.3 million of 2003.
A lot of pocket change for sure.
It's value decreased significantly over these years. Ubi's failures don't really contribute to IP value.Angelspit wrote:I wonder how much the rights would be worth today, compared to the US$1.3 million of 2003.
True. But let's look at the second part of the equation - buyer. Even though 3DO was forced to sell and the price was presumably low, there was no fierce competition for it from potential buyers. When IP was still good, mind you.Vitirr wrote:The quality of the games from Ubi has certainly decreased the value of the ip, but we are probably comparing with the moment in which the value was lowest. 3DO was in bankrupcy and HAD to sell.
The potential audience is wider, yes, but competition is much worse too. M&M still says a lot... to some old and tired grumpy peopleVitirr wrote:Besides the value of a gaming ip today I'm afraid is much higher than in 2003 as the potential audience is much wider, and I think the name M&M still says something to a lot of people.
I'm in no doubt that the M&M name still says something to a lot of people, just look at some of the comments from the interview, but again the difference is what it meant to people some 10-15 years ago and what it means to them today. I'm not sure those two values are the same. Sure you got a much bigger audience today, but as JVC also said in the interview, game industry is also much bigger and so is the competition. I doubt the brand has the same value today. Heroes II was voted the sixth-best PC game of all time by PC Gamer in May 1997.Vitirr wrote:Besides the value of a gaming ip today I'm afraid is much higher than in 2003 as the potential audience is much wider, and I think the name M&M still says something to a lot of people.
Because it sells?deepforest wrote:why JVC make now casual mobile crap, not fanasy tbs\rpg?
Watch interviewdeepforest wrote:why JVC love racing, not fantasy rpg?
Ask EAdeepforest wrote:why Generals2 was cancelled (JVC was general manager)?
Watch interviewdeepforest wrote:Homm series was killed by Ubisoft(i mean 6,7). What chances for reincarnation game LIKE HoMM(all rights for homm series have Ubi)?
I have a Sony notebook from 2005.Vitirr wrote:Just the factor of the time passing makes things more expensive.
NEW things of course. I don't know how anyone could get to that by reading my whole message.Dalai wrote:I have a Sony notebook from 2005.Vitirr wrote:Just the factor of the time passing makes things more expensive.
And a Spectrum from 1993.
Excellent working condition. VERY expensive. Let me know if you are interested
Also but JVC's answer was "because that's where most gamers are" which doesn't exactly have the same meaning.Avonu wrote:Because it sells?
Ditto.Dalai wrote:JVC says he would like to buy out the IP, given a chance. That would be very exciting. I'd even say it's one of the very few (if not the only) ways to bring the series back to life. I'll keep my fingers crossed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests