8x10

theLuckyDragon · Unread postby **theLuckyDragon** » 02 May 2006, 16:53

It could use its tail to hit the attacker, if it were a creature with a tail (1x4 gets me thinking of that sort of creature). Maybe it could also get a sort of penalty for attacking with the tail, because of the lack of accuracy? Hm, overcomplicating...

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 02 May 2006, 16:58

theLuckyDragon wrote:It could use its tail to hit the attacker, if it were a creature with a tail (1x4 gets me thinking of that sort of creature). Maybe it could also get a sort of penalty for attacking with the tail, because of the lack of accuracy? Hm, overcomplicating...

Maybe,maybe not.Depends on the way its implemented.

Ethric · Unread postby **Ethric** » 02 May 2006, 17:02

Well as of now I don't see any creatures that would be more than twice as long as wide. Sounds like snaketypes, and those could coil up while still, only at full length while moving.

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 02 May 2006, 17:05

Ethric wrote:Well as of now I don't see any creatures that would be more than twice as long as wide. Sounds like snaketypes, and those could coil up while still, only at full length while moving.

Id like dragons to be 2x4.I always prefered asiatic dragons over europian versions.

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 02 May 2006, 17:49

Of course, that would solve the dragon problem. Red/Black/Shadow Dragons could be like European dragons and Green/Gold/Emerals like Asian ones. It makes so much sense.

Orfinn · Unread postby **Orfinn** » 02 May 2006, 19:30

Yes it does, heroes lack some asian style well except some of the Sylvans architecture.

BenchBreaker · Unread postby **BenchBreaker** » 03 May 2006, 04:09

i think 1x2, 2x3, 2x4 and 3x4 creatures are fine, just don't make 1x4 ones

The Heroes Round Table

8x10

Do you:

Who is online