But H5&6 didn't, unless you count GRIFFIN ETERNAL! *Random Spell Cast*Mhorhe wrote:Rip-offs are inevitable in some measure, the important thing is to build something worthwhile with it. Which GW succeeded with their grimdark fantasy future
![dontknow ;|](/forums/images/smilies/dontknow.gif)
I think Heroes 6's cosmos is okay... they refined the cosmology much better than Heroes 5 (although I actually only 1.5 campaigns so it may be premature to say).mr.hackcrag wrote:But H5&6 didn't, unless you count GRIFFIN ETERNAL! *Random Spell Cast*Mhorhe wrote:Rip-offs are inevitable in some measure, the important thing is to build something worthwhile with it. Which GW succeeded with their grimdark fantasy future
Actually, by GW they meant Games Workshop, the company that created Warhammer and Warhammer 40.000. Hell, even somewhere in the Heroes V discussion is a thread called Warhammer of M&M, where people point out at the "little inspiration" Nival had while making Heroes V.ywhtptgtfo wrote:
However, I agree that GW's pretty successful in creating its own mythology, although I didn't like the fact thatSpoiler
the stupid spearmarshall bit ch from Nightfall became a goddess wtf
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 0 guests