no, they're working on delivering a game that sells good. it is clear in many aspects and i won't go into details.Elvin wrote:Those bastards are working on delivering you a good game.
kind of like starwars episode I-III.
Discussing personal preferences on an internet forum isn't likely to lead to someone getting convinced of anything. I loved both H3 and H4 but to me H4 is really the next step when it comes to strategy (multiple hero army means exponentially multiple choices) and gameplay(races play pretty different to each other in H4 than in H3).Infiltrator wrote:I'm pretty sure most of us would take Heroes 3, improve balance, hero diversity/advancement, and to top it off by drinking a potion that makes us think Heroes 4 was just a bad dream.Kranyum wrote:Take Heroes 4, slap some of the good stuff from Heroes 3 (mostly the combat screen) and u have a great thing to build upon.
Please, stop making complete idiot of yourself, it's not even funny.Kranyum wrote:... The fact of the matter is with H4 the devs tried to create something new and revolutionary which turned out to be quite fun (for some of us), whereas H5 failed and H6 will fail because they really havent strayed too much away from the winner H3 formula which you cannot really improve that much... or I guess, you can improve the graphics and artwork... which is exactly what they have added (lol).
honestly now, had they been working on a GOOD game, the 20% (more, i'd argue) we've seen so far would be way different.Elvin wrote:I'm sure you'd dislike making a game that sells poorly. As much as you'd like people to screw you over by pirating it. I haven't been a saint myself but seriously? The game is not even out, you know just about 20% about it if that and you condemn it already?
Now, if it was terribly overpriced, had DRM that required constant internet connection, had poor balance etc etc I would understand to an extent.. But right now you sound like a brat, no offense.
let's not flame eachother yes?parcaleste wrote:Please, stop making complete idiot of yourself, it's not even funny.Kranyum wrote:... The fact of the matter is with H4 the devs tried to create something new and revolutionary which turned out to be quite fun (for some of us), whereas H5 failed and H6 will fail because they really havent strayed too much away from the winner H3 formula which you cannot really improve that much... or I guess, you can improve the graphics and artwork... which is exactly what they have added (lol).
Just to shatter your illusions - pirating game in case you dislike it and wouldn't waste 50$ for it anyway, doesn't cost company anything. In fact it only adds to its marketing, and raises its popularity. On other hand if you like it and pirate, why in the hell you do that. Either way your evil master plan is foiled... Not that I might not borrow game first to know if it is worth my cash.i'm so hyped i just can't wait to pirate the game and and give my contribution to financially damaging the bastards.
Wow thats good attitude.Kranyum wrote:Censored.
I wouldn't waste my breath, some people are just chronically miserable.TheUndeadKing wrote:Guess what, Nival gave you just what you wanted, guys.Infiltrator wrote:I'm pretty sure most of us would take Heroes 3, improve balance, hero diversity/advancement
I found that there was always 1 AI player in H3 which took for ever to complete their turn. I always tried to hunt them down because of it.sezerp wrote:Yes, crappy AI, small maps and yet the turns somehow taking ages to complete are totally what we, H3 fans, wantedTheUndeadKing wrote:Guess what, Nival gave you just what you wanted, guys.Infiltrator wrote:I'm pretty sure most of us would take Heroes 3, improve balance, hero diversity/advancement
Elvin wrote:Umm H5 offered a LOT more tactical possibilities than H4 ever could. All it took was returning the town's units to 7, giving them all interesting specials and having alternative upgrades. If you see some good replays you'd be amazed at the depth of the game.
It was bound to get slower and smaller by going full 3D. But yeah there is also this game named "Civilization IV", which is slower and has a smaller world than Civilization II (which is my favorite game in the series) and it also had a pretty bad AI too (but it was patched later), but guess what, it plays GREAT and it's an EXCELLENT game.sezerp wrote:Yes, crappy AI, small maps and yet the turns somehow taking ages to complete are totally what we, H3 fans, wanted
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 7 guests