Just for kicks, then.Slayer of Cliffracers wrote:He's not crazy, beginning of argument.
According to MM9
- Nicolai is aware of "Devil problems"
- Nicolai and his general have been discussing the Devils
- Nicolai *presumes* (but isn't sure) the Devils may have had something to do with the fall of Castle Ironfist
- Nicolai isn't totally sure where he is, but calls himself "your King"
What do I interpret from this?
- Nicolai may be partially incorrect
- The Devils in question may be Kreegans
- Nicolai has practically no awareness of the Reckoning
- Nicolai presumes the Devils destroyed Ironfist when it was most likely the Reckoning
What do you seem to interpret from it?
- Nicolai's words should be taken at face value and everything he says is entirely objective and true
- The Devils in question are Kreegans, and therefore there were absolutely certainly Kreegans on Enroth right before the Reckoning (no doubt about it), and therefore either MM8 was wrong or the Kreegans re-invaded Enroth, and therefore Gauldoth is wrong in H4 when he states the Kreegans weren't on Enroth before the Reckoning
- Nicolai is calling himself King and therefore was crowned in Enroth, and therefore Roland died in H3, and therefore MM8 did not happen
- Nicolai isn't talking about the Reckoning, but a violent earthquake summoned by the Kreegans, and therefore it wasn't the Reckoning, and therefore Tim Lang (MM9 director) is wrong
I disagree with your assumptions because
- they contradict H4
- they contradict MM8
- they contradict MM9's director
- there is absolutely no evidence anywhere of a second Kreegan attack on Enroth, unless you believe that what confused Nicolai *presumed* is the truth
- you've already been so terribly incorrect about many issues throughout the thread
- you've demonstrated confusion regarding the series lore
- you admitted yourself that you haven't played many of the games
- etc, etc, etc, etc