What are you currently reading?
- Metathron
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: 29 Jan 2006
- Location: Somewhere deep in the Caribbean...
- Contact:
Reading Bill Bryson's A Walk in the Woods in which he sets out to conquer/rediscover the Appalachian Trail. Man I love this guy, there's so much to be learned from his books and, at the same time, he makes me laugh out loud, something which few books/films/TV shows manage to achieve. My favourite remains Down Under, however.
Jesus saves, Allah forgives, Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
- theLuckyDragon
- Round Table Knight
- Posts: 4883
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
I read Gulliver's Travels in English last month; Swift's language was absolutely delicious. Then I read Prelude to Foundation, also in English, as it was the only book of the series that I hadn't read. Now I'm reading Anne Frank's diary and it's really nice. After this I want to buy The Name of the Rose in Romanian, because my friends tell me it's good.
"Not all those who wander are lost." -- JRRT
A good book should be 1000 pages long at least. Whenever I find a book I like, I realize, how can 500-1000 pages be short. When I started to read the LotR a couple of years ago, I was sure that it's a long book with his 1500 pages, but when I was at the middle I was regretting that it's not triple than actually is.Pol wrote:The Hobbit is best of them.![]()
(not too long is another plus)
But it's true that some books don't have a story good enough to be told in 1K pages, for example I've read some books by Paulo Coelho, and though they aren't perfectly fitting my taste, they are quite readable, but couldn't be so goo, with double or triple size.
Last night I finished the last Harry Potter and funny how it gave me the "one more turn" feeling.
Though I didn't read the book I also heard many good opinions about it.tLD wrote:After this I want to buy The Name of the Rose in Romanian, because my friends tell me it's good.
"Rage against the system, the system, what kills the human spirit."
- Jolly Joker
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Metathron
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: 29 Jan 2006
- Location: Somewhere deep in the Caribbean...
- Contact:
So is this series any good? I've heard a lot of praise thrown at it.
I've looked it up on Wikipedia and I must admit I'm not too crazy about this part:
I've looked it up on Wikipedia and I must admit I'm not too crazy about this part:
Whilst Tolkien was inspired by mythology, A Song of Ice and Fire is more clearly influenced by medieval history, most notably the Wars of the Roses.
Putting aside Tolkien, because comparisons to LotR are tired and usually not even fair, it is easily the best fantasy series out there. The only other one that comes close was MST by Tad Williams, but they are completely different. This is not a swords and sorcery epic. At least, not yet. Which is why I probably like it so much. No "super wizard" or "evil dark lord" crap and no deus ex machina magic or prophesy garbage to mysteriously advance plotlines. It is incredibly realistic for something that's completely made up.
"What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?" - Richard P. Feynman
My only complaint is that it's not easy to keep track of who's who, since there are so many minor characters (who, occasionally, get promoted to major characters) and locations. But I found a great Web site to help me when I'm confused.
There's a separate thread for that series. We should probably move there if we want to talk about the books further.
That's so refreshing. But it also means I won't be able to read anything else fantasy from now on.Corribus wrote:No "super wizard" or "evil dark lord" crap and no deus ex machina magic or prophesy garbage to mysteriously advance plotlines.
There's a separate thread for that series. We should probably move there if we want to talk about the books further.
Last edited by Angelspit on 07 Mar 2008, 17:58, edited 1 time in total.
- Jolly Joker
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
There is a supernatural component to the work, which gives it that fantasy flavor, but it's not the main focus of the story - yet - and so far it's not much more than a backdrop for the events taking place.
Trust me. If you like fantasy, you *will* like these novels. Look, you buy Game of Thrones. You give it a try. If you don't like it, which is a near impossibility, you're out what... 5 bucks?
Trust me. If you like fantasy, you *will* like these novels. Look, you buy Game of Thrones. You give it a try. If you don't like it, which is a near impossibility, you're out what... 5 bucks?
"What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?" - Richard P. Feynman
take it from me as well, who doesn't really read anything else except fantasy, that these are suhweet!!! I read just the first three and they were all great, my biggest complaint is the sheer amount of time to get book 5 out - and I do suggest you stop at 3, at least til 5 is out, because he was forces to split book 4 into 4 and 5, so 4 seems to miss (at least I am told it does) some of my favourite characters!!!
Human madness is the howl of a child with a shattered heart.
I'm going to purchase the complete Harry Potter collection, now that it's finished. I have avoided buying them until now since I didn't want to if the series had turned into a never-ending line of books. It's up on Amazon for a very reasonable 70 quid.
In War: Resolution, In Defeat: Defiance, In Victory: Magnanimity, In Peace: Goodwill.
- Kareeah Indaga
- Archlich
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
I never knew that there is a book Interview with a Vampire... I only saw the movie, but never liked it.
My problem with fantasy books is that after LotR the majority seems to be just a coloring book. Don't know how could Harry Potter survive, but I liked it. From the 4th book there can be seen a good advance in the writing style of Rowling, experience is visible. Even the Hobbit seemed a bit weak read after LotR.
My problem with fantasy books is that after LotR the majority seems to be just a coloring book. Don't know how could Harry Potter survive, but I liked it. From the 4th book there can be seen a good advance in the writing style of Rowling, experience is visible. Even the Hobbit seemed a bit weak read after LotR.
"Rage against the system, the system, what kills the human spirit."
Interview with a vampire is nothing special, Louis's viewpoint sucks, the Vampire Lestat is good, Queen of the Damned is good too, Memnoch the Devil is interesting, and then some dross, picks up a bit with later ones in New Orleans, a little at least
Human madness is the howl of a child with a shattered heart.
Dunno... I also saw Queen of the Damned , but never read it... Maybe the book is good, but the movie wasn't special for me.
"Rage against the system, the system, what kills the human spirit."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests