Inferno Evolution

MrSteamTank · Unread postby **MrSteamTank** » 02 Sep 2006, 16:37

the homm3 and homm5 both look very good. I picked homm5 though due to the prettier graphics.

Homm4 looks horrible. I don't see the connectin with inferno at all.

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 02 Sep 2006, 19:53

Milla aka. the Slayer wrote: You know it really is okay to be confused right?

If it wasn't about 90% of the population of our planet would be in big trouble.

@MrSteamTank

Damn WC3 graphics. Damn Blizzard. Any other game/company and no one would say it looked good.

MrSteamTank · Unread postby **MrSteamTank** » 03 Sep 2006, 17:14

Tis true that I love blizzard-style graphics. Honestly I will admit that all blizzard games are very dated and could definitely use a boost in graphics. However, the art style and the excellent blizzard support is what made them the gaming company they are today.

I'm not fond of the old heroes art to be honest and nival in that sense is taking a step in the right direction. Anyways heroes 5 did quite well for itself and I partially believe its due to the new art direction they took.

Although with their current level of support I think their expansion will sell significantly less copies. I mean how can you sell a game that brags about multiplayer then doesn't offer promised simultaneous turns. So now we have to wait until the expansion to have a playable multiplayer? Oh great...

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 03 Sep 2006, 17:46

MrSteamTank wrote:Tis true that I love blizzard-style graphics. Honestly I will admit that all blizzard games are very dated and could definitely use a boost in graphics. However, the art style and the excellent blizzard support is what made them the gaming company they are today.

Though blizzard has an interesting style,though SC looks amazing even now,and WC is great,this is not something that is transferable to other games.Especially not heroes.

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 03 Sep 2006, 20:04

MrSteamTank wrote:Tis true that I love blizzard-style graphics. Honestly I will admit that all blizzard games are very dated and could definitely use a boost in graphics. However, the art style and the excellent blizzard support is what made them the gaming company they are today.

SC still looks good. WC3 never did. I liked the game and really didn't care untill everyone else started copying it. Badly.

theLuckyDragon · Unread postby **theLuckyDragon** » 03 Sep 2006, 20:35

Sauron wrote:Are me and TT only ones who understand "ugly" means?!

*ahem* me too

I think the quotation marks and the smiley made the poll pretty clear.

asandir · Unread postby **asandir** » 04 Sep 2006, 09:16

Are me and TT only ones who understand "ugly" means?!

nope, hence my "ugliest" comment .... so that's four at least by my count that "got" it

Milla aka. the Slayer · Unread postby **Milla aka. the Slayer** » 04 Sep 2006, 11:46

@TT: so you're the minority here

Deni · Unread postby **Deni** » 04 Sep 2006, 11:58

voted h4

Metathron · Unread postby **Metathron** » 06 Sep 2006, 12:06

I'm going with H3. Even though the H5 Inferno is visually stunning, the buildings are too plain and similar to each other. The overabundance of fiery elements is also something that makes Inferno less appealing, to me at least.

I can hardly consider the H4 candidate as an Inferno candidate, since it's mixed with the Death element. The devil building is great, though.

Ethric · Unread postby **Ethric** » 06 Sep 2006, 20:37

Snip, snip, BS begone.

Corribus · Unread postby **Corribus** » 19 Jun 2007, 13:58

H5 wins here. H3's inferno has too many building styles, and H4's just look terrible, like all the town screens in H4 (not to mention, I don't know what they were thinking putting inferno and necropolis in the same town - what a dumb idea).

jeff · Unread postby **jeff** » 19 Jun 2007, 14:38

H3's grail is just fabulous.

HodgePodge · Unread postby **HodgePodge** » 19 Jun 2007, 15:28

Voted Heroes III

Really, it's the original Heroes Inferno and very hellish. Too bad Heroes IV mixed the Necro & Inferno alignments. And I just don't like the Heroes V one at all.

Orfinn · Unread postby **Orfinn** » 19 Jun 2007, 23:26

And I just don't like the Heroes V one at all.

Why not?

Panda Tar · Unread postby **Panda Tar** » 05 Jul 2007, 17:35

Heroes 5 got the picture of what I was thinking of a hell-like town - in the hell. Although H3 was nice indeed, if we take of the Grail, it loses most of its touch (IMHO!), while H5 seemed like hell all the time, and structures go well with the main building.

Heroes 4....

*taking a big desperated breath

*
"There's no word in entish, elvish or in the tongue of men to describe such horror."

Wulfstan8182 · Unread postby **Wulfstan8182** » 11 Nov 2007, 00:41

Akul wrote:H3 Inferno:

this guy has been doing some scripting in WoG eh? with the Red Dragons hired in here it's pretty nice.

anyway, i voted for H5 how the town is so EVIL and all the buildings are perfect for the creatures

Metathron · Unread postby **Metathron** » 11 Nov 2007, 09:36

I feel like I need to have sunglasses on when entering the HoMM V inferno.

Suleman · Unread postby **Suleman** » 11 Nov 2007, 14:28

Heroes 3, no question. Heroes 5 Inferno looks monotonic, the buildings are impossible to distinguish. Heroes 4 doesn't even count.

madshj · Unread postby **madshj** » 25 Jul 2008, 14:17

H5 definitely!

it looks awesome with all the fire^^

BTW whats the "dragon" on the inferno? the head doesnt look like a dragon, so i suppose its some kind of dragon demon

Would also like to know what the special necropolis unit in the necropolis army you see is

i know its scripts, but those 2 looks good

so maybe you got a link or something?^^

The Heroes Round Table

Inferno Evolution

Vote for the most "ugly" inferno

Re: Inferno Evolution

Who is online