![smile :)](/forums/images/smilies/smile9.gif)
You know what, come to think of it, I dislike Ubisoft (but I like Nival). Most of their games I played on my PC crashed or cause me serious (computer reinstalment) problems...
Bugs are to be expected. Cut features is another matter entirely.george137 wrote:This is a bit rash dont you think. Sure the game could be a bit unbalanced when it first comes out but have you ever seen a game that was perfect from the release, especially stratagy games?
As soon as they post some (good) news on this, the supression will be ended.And how will we know if they delayed the game if we dont pay attention to the news =P?
Because although companies are supposed to make rational profit-maximising decisions, those decisions get made by people. Let's not irritate those people when it will achieve nothing - and asking a large company to change course over a weekend will achieve nothing.Arzang wrote:yet another lame argument. WHY do we have to wait for them to react?Kilfire wrote:This pact strikes me as being a bit premature. Ubi are a big company, you can't expect them to react as fast as the community does.
...apart from souring relations between the parties, no...Arzang wrote: let's say that tomorrow they say something along the lines of: "we had already planned a summer release. we just didn't have the time to tell you blabla.". what will be the effect? nothing. this pact may have been a bit early, causing a day or two of news suppression but other than that nothing bad would've happened.
I never said it was bad, only premature. Good idea, poor timing. There would be no loss of "safety" in waiting a few days. If Ubi were determined to release H5 on March 31st, they don't have to commit to that until the end of February.Arzang wrote: now say the situation is otherwise and the game IS slated for an early release; would you then say that this pact was in any way or how bad?
it's still better to be safe than sorry.
Err- we're talking almost every website dedicated to Heroes here. It's what's supposed to keep the game alive until they've managed to create an expansion, or the next game in the series. They can't totally ignore us.Kilfire wrote: It also demonstrates a lack of understanding of who you're talking to. It's enough that the community is small enough for Ubi to ignore if they so wish. Let's not give them an easy excuse.
Nope. With almost a month's work of distributing the game, they are pretty much forced to decide now: what to continue work on and what to cut (because they'll probably have to cut a lot).I never said it was bad, only premature. Good idea, poor timing. There would be no loss of "safety" in waiting a few days. If Ubi were determined to release H5 on March 31st, they don't have to commit to that until the end of February.
I've brought this up in the bugs section - it's a problem caused by people who post from the RT boards. The quoting function is not carried over, unfortunatey.Kareeah Indaga wrote:OT: Will the people who are quoting other people PLEASE ACTUALLY USE THE QUOTE KEYS?? Or something similar? It would only take about ten more seconds to type and it's rather jarring to read without them.
Certainly we don't expect a game to be perfect, since this is an impossibility, but I suppose we, as the community, do want a game that is finished. Anyone who has played the beta knows of the problems that exist in this game. Heck, only duel mode is really functional.(And even then it is chock full of balance issues...)alchemy wrote:I think this is too harsh. You guys should understand that if Ubisoft did not buy the Heroes franchise, then we would all be lounging around making new maps for H4 or H3. You guys should be happy for that the Heroes game will continue and remember that a game will never be perfect. Yet I also get that this plan will only be temporary because as someone said before Nival only has to make a statement confirming the delay.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests