Caradoc wrote:The term "intelligent life" is hard to nail down. It's pretty damned arrogant to define 'intelligence' as the ability to communicate with us. And whatever behaviors we employ as the criteria for 'intelligence' are certain to be equally self centered and arbitrary.
Tehnological intelligence of any kind should do. Otherwise we should just stick to dolphins.
Caradoc wrote:
It is a scientific mystery how the Earth has managed to retain so much of its water, given the extreme heat that prevailed early on.
What?! You know how rain gets made?! Unless there's some method in which evaporated water can leave the atmosphere that shouldn't be a problem.
So is the Earth so unique that it is the only place intelligent life could have appeared? It is fallacious to reason than an infinite universe guarantees that all possibilities must be realized.
Not all posibilities, but all probabilities. If it happened once it's fallacious to think it can't happen again or it hasn't happened before.
My conclusion is that 'life' itself came from 'out there', but 'intelligence' as we know it emerged here. There may be other slants on intelligence elsewhere, but they may not be recognizable to us. However, sometimes I get depressed and think of Charles Fort's hypothesis: we are being fished for.
Well we are talking about intelligence as it is here, otherwise i could say bacterias are intelligent coz they're good at surviving.
How so? The Bible for instance makes no reference as to whether or not God created life on other planets.
The universe, then earth, then life then humans... after that he rested. No mention of going back to work somewhere else.
lich-boy wrote:
Yep. Good thing I didn't.
No one said you did.