Will H-V run on Windows Vista?
Will H-V run on Windows Vista?
Windows Vista will be released in Feb, 2007.
I read on Gamespot at
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6154735/index.html most games made for Windows XP will run with a DirectX 9.0L but I didn't see any Might & Magic games listed.. hmmmm
I was wondering if H-V/HOF will run on the Vista format since the new operating system will also have a completely new DirectX 10 format which is suppose to be completely different than the previous DirectX versions except for Microsofts DirectX 9.OL? Does anyone know?
I read on Gamespot at
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6154735/index.html most games made for Windows XP will run with a DirectX 9.0L but I didn't see any Might & Magic games listed.. hmmmm
I was wondering if H-V/HOF will run on the Vista format since the new operating system will also have a completely new DirectX 10 format which is suppose to be completely different than the previous DirectX versions except for Microsofts DirectX 9.OL? Does anyone know?
How you Treat people & what You Do or Don't Do will someday come back to "Bite You" or "Bless You". The Choice is Yours & will Affect You Today & Everyday of Your Future. Granny
- MistWeaver
- Wraith
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: 28 Feb 2006
- Location: Citadel of Frosts
-
- Pixie
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Yo
I've already tried it on vista its runs alright but problem is.. - i have 1.25GB RAM and vista just takes up too much so it runs alot better on xp then on vista.(faster...)
- HodgePodge
- Round Table Knight
- Posts: 3530
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
I have 1.5 GB RAM and have no plans to put Vista on my current computer. My computer runs Heroes 5 fantastically, as well as all my other games too; and I'm not planning on buying a new computer for a few more years at least. I guess my computer will have to go into obsolete mode before I get a new one. Why mess with something that works so well already?
- Metathron
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: 29 Jan 2006
- Location: Somewhere deep in the Caribbean...
- Contact:
I agree with Hodge. I bought my computer last April and have no intentions of buying a new one for at least several more years, nor do I plan on upgrading to Vista which I assume is still in a buggy state and a long time will pass until it is brought up to par. I'm also not particularly thrilled at the thought that Vista would be hogging a large amount of my system resources.
Recently, I have read an article in a serious computer magazine, wherein the author predicts that by the end of 2007 only 5% of computers will have been using the business edition of Windows Vista, and only 15% by the end of 2008. It's a tentative prediction, but I tend to agree.
Recently, I have read an article in a serious computer magazine, wherein the author predicts that by the end of 2007 only 5% of computers will have been using the business edition of Windows Vista, and only 15% by the end of 2008. It's a tentative prediction, but I tend to agree.
Jesus saves, Allah forgives, Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
Large companies take their time to upgrade the software on their desktops, especially the OS. When you have thousands of computer connected to a network, a serious security glitch in a new OS can cause a lot of trouble.Metathron wrote:5% of computers will have been using the business edition of Windows Vista, and only 15% by the end of 2008.
My machine is nearly 5 five years (and running Heroes V and Dark Messiah well enough). No Vista for me.
-
- Pixie
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 04 Sep 2006
BTW
To everyone... Vista is Awesome i suppose with 2GB RAM i would probably keep it.. if you got alot of RAM you really should try it to ,its really very BEATIFULE...
As for you that have problems with ram there is one neat feature in Vista.
Any usb flash drive can be used for virtual memory (and thus emulate the ram) which should increase the overall performance..
I have 1 Gig USB stick that acts as a support RAM on my home computer and there is considerable growth in performance when compared to using hard drive space for same task..
Note that it still cant be as effective as 1 gig of pure ram would be but if you have usb memory, why not use it )
However, price of Vista is way to high and it wont bring you much good on todays average PC.
Any usb flash drive can be used for virtual memory (and thus emulate the ram) which should increase the overall performance..
I have 1 Gig USB stick that acts as a support RAM on my home computer and there is considerable growth in performance when compared to using hard drive space for same task..
Note that it still cant be as effective as 1 gig of pure ram would be but if you have usb memory, why not use it )
However, price of Vista is way to high and it wont bring you much good on todays average PC.
I've got a perfectly capable Vista machine but don't really intend to put Vista on it until I am forced to.
FYI: Win XP is scheduled to be in its main life cycle another 2 years. Then for 2 more years after that you should still be able to get security updates from Windows Update.
Until must-have hardware or software is released that is effectively Vista only I don't really see the purpose of upgrading to Vista ....
Contrary to what others may say I do thing that Vista will very shortly be as or more secure than XP.
FYI: Win XP is scheduled to be in its main life cycle another 2 years. Then for 2 more years after that you should still be able to get security updates from Windows Update.
Until must-have hardware or software is released that is effectively Vista only I don't really see the purpose of upgrading to Vista ....
Contrary to what others may say I do thing that Vista will very shortly be as or more secure than XP.
Re: BTW
Ever tried Linux +XGL or AIGLX???nevermindspy wrote:To everyone... Vista is Awesome i suppose with 2GB RAM i would probably keep it.. if you got alot of RAM you really should try it to ,its really very BEATIFULE...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fedo ... -AIGLX.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Comp ... 4-2006.png
......................
and you can have it working well with even 512 ram ....
I will go to Vista only when forced by the need for DirectX 10. It looks damned good, but it takes a $500 graphics card to take advantage of it. All the TV stuff, I can live without.
Before you criticize someone, first walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you'll be a mile away. And you'll have their shoes.
- DeejMaster
- Leprechaun
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 19 Oct 2006
- Location: Muskogee, Oklahoma
You know, I don't use any more functions on my computer now, than I did when I had Windows 95, with the exception of 3rd party programs that work alot better than anything that came with XP. So, why in the world would I invest in a OS that would eat up my current resources? If Windows 95 was still supported, our computers could dedicate nearly all resources to games and applications.
If you think XP is a resource hog, wait until you "upgrade" to Vista.
If you think XP is a resource hog, wait until you "upgrade" to Vista.
- murasamune
- Leprechaun
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 21 Jan 2007
its incredibly easy to hate microsoft just for being microsoft. its a lot harder to actually look at what they're putting out and see how its actually better. try reading up on it before you automatically hate it and post some more reasons why its bad.
so far ive seen
it costs too much
why upgrade when i dont need to?
its a memory hog
it costs too much? how dare microsoft try to make money for something its spent time developing
why upgrade?
youre right! you dont need to.
its a memory hog
click memory management
so far ive seen
it costs too much
why upgrade when i dont need to?
its a memory hog
it costs too much? how dare microsoft try to make money for something its spent time developing
why upgrade?
youre right! you dont need to.
its a memory hog
click memory management
Hmm my computer sulks when I just try to run HoMM5 sometimes...I have 512 ram..and I don't want to upgrade or buy a new computer right now (not that I can't afford one, but personally I like to make things last as long as possible). Also though I don't mind Microsoft it has a proven track record. When it updates windows there are always security holes in it. Not sometimes, not most of the time, but every time. When they plug the holes, I will deffinately ditch the old comp and get a new one, which will come with Vista, so why buy it seperate?
(ps is it just me or does it seem they get the old one secure just in time to announce the new one? Maybe 6 months usually, if that. Could be my imagination though hehe).
(ps is it just me or does it seem they get the old one secure just in time to announce the new one? Maybe 6 months usually, if that. Could be my imagination though hehe).
Warning, may cause confusion, blindness, raising of eybrows, and insanity.
Yeah how dare they ... you obviously do not see the problem the the price is a bit too much .....murasamune wrote: it costs too much? how dare microsoft try to make money for something its spent time developing
Also while there are good free alternatives like GNU/Linux FreeBSD.... good question why pay so much money for Vista ?
Eventually you will have to upgrade ... no security updates from MS ... also software developers may stop supporting XP just like some of them stopped supporting 98 and 2000.why upgrade?
youre right! you dont need to.
I've seen Vista and it's 3d environment to take 500 MB RAM on a comp ... Now why other 3d desktops in other OS do not require so much RAM ???its a memory hog
........
BTW add to the list
- DRM system build in the kernel. I'm curious so many people here were against Starforce in HoMM5 but they are OK with the DRMs ??
Interesting links :
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;261269498
http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/390
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests