Simple.
I just started the hof dungeon campaign and I noticed that my troops have +2 morale in battle, despite me not having +morale abilities/artifacts, neither visited map morale boosters...
I noticed this happened also in other campaigns...why?
Why +2 morale?
Why +2 morale?
And with the passing of strange eons, even death may die.
H.P. Lovecraft - gentleman, writer and dreamer.
H.P. Lovecraft - gentleman, writer and dreamer.
- godlyatheist
- Leprechaun
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 14 Nov 2006
- PhoenixReborn
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 2014
- Joined: 24 May 2006
- Location: US
- PhoenixReborn
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 2014
- Joined: 24 May 2006
- Location: US
- Mirez
- Moderator
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: 28 Aug 2006
- Location: in the core of the hart of the centre of everything
his point is that when you use the ring that reduces luck is more powerfull since normally the opponent doesn't have +2 luck like moralePhoenixReborn wrote:So basically aaelgr you are arguing that luck is more powerful (and therefore should be reduced) than morale?
Because if I understand it right, the morale and luck numbers are capped at 5 and then the rings are going to reduce them to 3.
though I don't quite agree, what's better? not having opponent troops act quicky because of morale once in a while, or have enemy troops make attacks with only half as much as they would do without bad luck?
I'd say it's quite even
treants are dendrosexual 0_o
- godlyatheist
- Leprechaun
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 14 Nov 2006
- godlyatheist
- Leprechaun
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 14 Nov 2006
That depends on the factio your going against. If your fighting sylvan, it will have +2 morale and +5 luck (usually). Therefore, it's better to reduce morale so sylvan troops don't get the chance to do more lucky hits. Also, during early-mid game, it's hard tp have +5 luck or morale. So, those 2 arties will be more effective. Using them late game is silly unless you know the enemy don't have those two skill.haloswift wrote:his point is that when you use the ring that reduces luck is more powerfull since normally the opponent doesn't have +2 luck like moralePhoenixReborn wrote:So basically aaelgr you are arguing that luck is more powerful (and therefore should be reduced) than morale?
Because if I understand it right, the morale and luck numbers are capped at 5 and then the rings are going to reduce them to 3.
though I don't quite agree, what's better? not having opponent troops act quicky because of morale once in a while, or have enemy troops make attacks with only half as much as they would do without bad luck?
I'd say it's quite even
Cloak of death shadow + the 2 rings is nasty tho....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest