Galactic Civilization
Galactic Civilization
I am thinking about buying Galactic Civilization, I have read reviews saying it is the true descendant of Master of Origin. Now I loved Master of Origin and lost many evening playing it. I even enjoyed MOO-II, but never bought MOO-III as the reviews and fan reactions were so negative. I have bought Heroes V but I do not think it will run of my laptop but will probably try if I decide to use its often promised editor, so it will for the present be loaded only on my new desktop, but I want something I can play on my laptop. It has a Pentium 2.8 GHz, 512 RAM, but uses the Intel 82852/82855 GM/GME integrated video controller. Now I have not played GC before and would probably buy GC-II, any comments?
Mala Ipsa Nova
Nah, it's not a "descendant" of MoO, true or otherwise. That's just a comment from dumb reviewers who think all space TBS's are the same
It's very good nonetheless. Big selling points are the level of work that went into the AI (other companies making TBS's should sit up and take notes, though I am not holding my breath), and the constant patching and rebalancing they do.
You can design your own ships, diplomacy can be quite involved (though not perfect of course), and it's generally a good and fun game, if you are into TBS's. No multiplayer though, not even a hotseat option, that can be a bit of a detraction. The argument is that most people don't play much MP anyways so might as well make sure it's as good an SP game as possible. Still, hotseat is missed.
It's very good nonetheless. Big selling points are the level of work that went into the AI (other companies making TBS's should sit up and take notes, though I am not holding my breath), and the constant patching and rebalancing they do.
You can design your own ships, diplomacy can be quite involved (though not perfect of course), and it's generally a good and fun game, if you are into TBS's. No multiplayer though, not even a hotseat option, that can be a bit of a detraction. The argument is that most people don't play much MP anyways so might as well make sure it's as good an SP game as possible. Still, hotseat is missed.
Who the hell locks these things?
- Duke
- Duke
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
Well that pretty much describes me, and I won't need Hotseat, though I do see why it would be missed. Sounds like a buy to me, I'll do it through the CH link, so they can get a cut.Ethric wrote: The argument is that most people don't play much MP anyways so might as well make sure it's as good an SP game as possible. Still, hotseat is missed.
Mala Ipsa Nova
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
- cornellian
- Conscript
- Posts: 233
- Joined: 05 Jun 2006
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
- cornellian
- Conscript
- Posts: 233
- Joined: 05 Jun 2006
It is good until those dreadful missions come, but you may beat them without too much problems of course, enjoying your way through.. You won't if you have my playing style though which is controlled expansion.. There are quite few situations you will be punished because you didn't expand like crazy, spending all your money in settlers in the first 20 turns.Ethric wrote:Never tried the campaign in fact. Any good?
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
Good thing Ive learned this from the civilization I.Almost every strategy game is easily played if you expand like crazy.cornellian wrote:It is good until those dreadful missions come, but you may beat them without too much problems of course, enjoying your way through.. You won't if you have my playing style though which is controlled expansion.. There are quite few situations you will be punished because you didn't expand like crazy, spending all your money in settlers in the first 20 turns.
So did you bought it jeff?
Actually Galactic Civilzation and Galactic Civilization II. are different games. Not much, but important is:
* in gc here's a "star council"
* gc doesn't require supercomputer
* in pure gc you cannot design your ships
* so pure gc is like galactic chess spiced about lot of diplomacy, you almost never can win it by brute force like other games (fe Heroes )
I don't feel the needs for GC2 myself, I virtually stayed on just GC from '98 - but, with ability to design your ship you can easily go through all campaigns in GC2, especially if you are not burdened with its ancestor like was Brad. (However he is forgiven as he's creator of the game). With right designed ships you can swim through the campaign with quite easiness I heard.
Actually Galactic Civilzation and Galactic Civilization II. are different games. Not much, but important is:
* in gc here's a "star council"
* gc doesn't require supercomputer
* in pure gc you cannot design your ships
* so pure gc is like galactic chess spiced about lot of diplomacy, you almost never can win it by brute force like other games (fe Heroes )
I don't feel the needs for GC2 myself, I virtually stayed on just GC from '98 - but, with ability to design your ship you can easily go through all campaigns in GC2, especially if you are not burdened with its ancestor like was Brad. (However he is forgiven as he's creator of the game). With right designed ships you can swim through the campaign with quite easiness I heard.
"We made it!"
The Archives | Collection of H3&WoG files | Older albeit still useful | CH Downloads
PC Specs: A10-7850K, FM2A88X+K, 16GB-1600, SSD-MLC-G3, 1TB-HDD-G3, MAYA44, SP10 500W Be Quiet
The Archives | Collection of H3&WoG files | Older albeit still useful | CH Downloads
PC Specs: A10-7850K, FM2A88X+K, 16GB-1600, SSD-MLC-G3, 1TB-HDD-G3, MAYA44, SP10 500W Be Quiet
Return to “Hall of the Heretics”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests