And what’s the problem if I want to do this and I can? This is the beauty of the mod that everyone plays as they please. If you want to play within certain limits and strict rules, then play, who's stopping you? But promoting this nonsense is a bad idea. Let's then introduce strict censorship on the names of the characters, let's limit the player's time of passage, otherwise why the hell his characters live for 200 years, this is implausible and a lot of similar nonsense can be invented so that everyone ends up playing the SAME and in general why play if you can just show the CORRECT passage.Xfing wrote: ↑21 Jan 2024, 22:25Having "dragon knights" and the like is still not the standard way to play. It's a possibility for niche players and a quirky experiment at best, and clearly breaks immersion. That's like allowing the player to pick the Barbarian's model in Diablo 2 but have him develop according to the Necromancer's skill tree, for example. Because why limit something, right?Rozwaal wrote: ↑21 Jan 2024, 14:53 Why do you just want to limit something? What is the point of limiting the player in his worldview and giving clear instructions on what is “good” and what is “bad”? It was only after so long that we came to the idea of complete freedom in class and race, and you want to roll back everything and again reduce everything to a template and post a huge table "LOCKED" on all possible combinations
So if you want to play within such a framework, play, but don’t try to impose it on others.