Indeed so.But those that control them,the necromancers,are pure evil in HV.Look at markal.A typical boring mad evil necromancer.Sauron wrote:Well, nekromancers are only fighting for power against the wizards. In fact, undead aren't evil. They don't have feelings. They do what is needed.
Renegade units in Addon
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
He is fighting for power. He does not wake and say: "Hmmmmm. Whom could I kill today for fun?". He wakes and says: "Hmmmmm. How could I become more powerful today?" All magicians are like that.DaemianLucifer wrote:Indeed so.But those that control them,the necromancers,are pure evil in HV.Look at markal.A typical boring mad evil necromancer.Sauron wrote:Well, nekromancers are only fighting for power against the wizards. In fact, undead aren't evil. They don't have feelings. They do what is needed.
I am back and ready to... ready to... post things.
He isn`t evil, he is retarted.DaemianLucifer wrote:Indeed so.But those that control them,the necromancers,are pure evil in HV.Look at markal.A typical boring mad evil necromancer.Sauron wrote:Well, nekromancers are only fighting for power against the wizards. In fact, undead aren't evil. They don't have feelings. They do what is needed.
...
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
I remember another magician that fought for power:Dracon.But he wasnt evil,nor mad.Markal is just a stereotypical necromancer.Not a magician,but necromancer,damnit!Evil and mad!Mad as all of us are!!Mwahahahaha!!!Sauron wrote: He is fighting for power. He does not wake and say: "Hmmmmm. Whom could I kill today for fun?". He wakes and says: "Hmmmmm. How could I become more powerful today?" All magicians are like that.
Have to agree with the necro=evil thing. It's not bad enough that they desire power (academy is not evil, they are neutral), they want your soul/body to serve them eternally as well. They don't care if you are an innocent peasant or a powerful wizard, they will feed on you and then defile your corpse.
That being said, evil and good are subjective. Take the Norse for instance. In there society raping, killing, and plundering would get you into there version of heaven. Ask any powerhungry mad despot if he is evil and he/she will emphatically say no, that they are doing what they are for the 'greater good'. Just the 2c worth of somebody west of sanity and east of madness.
That being said, evil and good are subjective. Take the Norse for instance. In there society raping, killing, and plundering would get you into there version of heaven. Ask any powerhungry mad despot if he is evil and he/she will emphatically say no, that they are doing what they are for the 'greater good'. Just the 2c worth of somebody west of sanity and east of madness.
Warning, may cause confusion, blindness, raising of eybrows, and insanity.
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
Thats so untrue.I would never label Gauldoth as a stereotypical necromancer.I even played a good necro once.It is such an interesting concept.Too bad its not used more often.Mytical302 wrote:Have to agree with the necro=evil thing. It's not bad enough that they desire power (academy is not evil, they are neutral), they want your soul/body to serve them eternally as well. They don't care if you are an innocent peasant or a powerful wizard, they will feed on you and then defile your corpse.
I agree with that.There really is no true good and true evil.But its much easier to make evil demons and good knights in shining armour than to think of something original.Mytical302 wrote: That being said, evil and good are subjective. Take the Norse for instance. In there society raping, killing, and plundering would get you into there version of heaven. Ask any powerhungry mad despot if he is evil and he/she will emphatically say no, that they are doing what they are for the 'greater good'. Just the 2c worth of somebody west of sanity and east of madness.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Bah, you want a sense of ambiguity, check out Discipples. Sure there are both evil and good factions, but they all have real reasons to do what they do, and not just "to kill stuff".
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
Well they have reasons in Heroes5...ThunderTitan wrote:Bah, you want a sense of ambiguity, check out Discipples. Sure there are both evil and good factions, but they all have real reasons to do what they do, and not just "to kill stuff".
Demon Soverign want to accure demon messiah...
Merkal want to restore Necromantic order and gain power.
Issabel want to defend Griffin Empire from demons regardless of costs.
Elves want to defend their country from demons and undead.
Mages want to destroy undead and demon threat.
-
- Pixie
- Posts: 110
- Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Academy: gremlins, beastman and orcs as lower-level beings
Sylvan: imperialism and committing genocide (not just war) on their brethren.
Haven: strict theocracy and serfdom
Dungeons: cruel slavery and deadly treachery
Necropolis: defiling graves and recklessly forcing their world-view
Inferno: too reckless about trying to escape from their aweful condition
Sylvan: imperialism and committing genocide (not just war) on their brethren.
Haven: strict theocracy and serfdom
Dungeons: cruel slavery and deadly treachery
Necropolis: defiling graves and recklessly forcing their world-view
Inferno: too reckless about trying to escape from their aweful condition
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
I meant real reasons, not i'm evil and require power. Real people never think of themselves as evil.player1 wrote: Well they have reasons in Heroes5...
Demon Soverign want to accure demon messiah...
Merkal want to restore Necromantic order and gain power.
Issabel want to defend Griffin Empire from demons regardless of costs.
Elves want to defend their country from demons and undead.
Mages want to destroy undead and demon threat.
That duality is present in Disciples in which Bethrezen basicaly got screwed badly by jealous angels and wants rather justified revenge and Mortis wants to ressurect her one true love. Does that make them evil?
In Ashan demons just want to destroy stuff (the DM is just a means to an end), and the undead/necros to kill everyone so they rule the world. Where is the grey area? The fact that the "good" guys are a-holes? Yeah, making the good guys bad make for a really mature and dark universe, along with using a high contrast setting.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
- Jolly Joker
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Good or evil is not decided over motives; it's the means that make the difference. You can want to rule the whole world alright. That's not evil. If you try it with war, it is - basically because you care a turd about the well-being of others and force them into something, they wouldn't really want. But if you try it "by the rules", it's not evil.
So motives don't play any role here.
So motives don't play any role here.
Well, I don't think Markal resons are bad.ThunderTitan wrote: I meant real reasons, not i'm evil and require power. Real people never think of themselves as evil.
That duality is present in Disciples in which Bethrezen basicaly got screwed badly by jealous angels and wants rather justified revenge and Mortis wants to ressurect her one true love. Does that make them evil?
In Ashan demons just want to destroy stuff (the DM is just a means to an end), and the undead/necros to kill everyone so they rule the world. Where is the grey area? The fact that the "good" guys are a-holes? Yeah, making the good guys bad make for a really mature and dark universe, along with using a high contrast setting.
We wowed revenge against Silver Cities and Zehir father, since they killed his mentor (Sandro) and destroyed Necromantic order.
And he doesn't really thinks of him as evil. More like "practical" and power hungry.
As for Demon Soverign, he has his reasons too. The revelation of old prophecy and demon messiah. Also, the Griffin and Falcon houses where their old enemies for generations. I mean hundreads and hundreads of years he, as well as his predecessors, tried to take them down
- Jolly Joker
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
let me repeat
i agree that if the motive is pure, the action can still seed evil consequences
if my motive is to rape someone, then it is evil .... there is no action you can take to make it "good"well, motives can be evil as well as good .... there is no "good" way to rape a person for example, the means cannot justify the end
i agree that if the motive is pure, the action can still seed evil consequences
Human madness is the howl of a child with a shattered heart.
- Jolly Joker
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Well, no, what's working in one direction is working in the other as well. You can have the purpose to rape someone as often as you want - as long as you actually don't do it, everything is fine.
This is because purposes are completely irrelevant in determining whether something is good or evil or inconsequential or whatever. Purposes are cheap - it's only the action that counts. I mean, who is more evil, a guy who has the purpose to kill the whole world - but doesn't get around to even start with it for whatever the reason, or a guy who wants to purge the evil from the face of this world - and starts a real genocide about it?
This is because purposes are completely irrelevant in determining whether something is good or evil or inconsequential or whatever. Purposes are cheap - it's only the action that counts. I mean, who is more evil, a guy who has the purpose to kill the whole world - but doesn't get around to even start with it for whatever the reason, or a guy who wants to purge the evil from the face of this world - and starts a real genocide about it?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests