Heroes VI pictures
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
And the story of how the devs got to make the game is mind blowing.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Actually about how GW sued them over their game using some logos from them while being a blood bowl clone and after they hired them to make an actual Blood Bowl game...
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
If we bring in the Warhammer universe, then I would prefer vampires based on Blood Dragons, rather than the other bloodlines. But I also prefer medieval and renaissance noblemen to those of the Victorian era.ThunderTitan wrote:Now see, these are proppa vampires: http://www.bloodbowl-game.com/img/media ... ary_04.jpg They're so cool they even have shades.
Please inform me if my sentences contains grammatical mistakes.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
We already brought in WH with H5 (especially with the DE's).
And that Blood Dragon dude is way too Coppola's Dracula armour for my tastes... way too much red.
But the idea was that the one in the picture i posted from BB has a certain whimsy about it... something Heroes could benefit from getting back.
And that Blood Dragon dude is way too Coppola's Dracula armour for my tastes... way too much red.
But the idea was that the one in the picture i posted from BB has a certain whimsy about it... something Heroes could benefit from getting back.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
Good god, don't remind me. I hate the Dark Elves.ThunderTitan wrote:We already brought in WH with H5 (especially with the DE's).
I didn't mean that specific armour (though agree that it's too red), but more that what kind of Vampire it is.And that Blood Dragon dude is way too Coppola's Dracula armour for my tastes... way too much red.
You mean like the tuxedo wearing Vampires of H4? Because I weren't weren't too happy with that.But the idea was that the one in the picture i posted from BB has a certain whimsy about it... something Heroes could benefit from getting back.
I can't really say I either remember or miss anything whimsy about Heroes. While I've played H2 at a friend's place a long time ago, my own first Heroes game was H3.
Please inform me if my sentences contains grammatical mistakes.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
And what does that have to do with what he's wearing?!Rion wrote: I didn't mean that specific armour (though agree that it's too red), but more that what kind of Vampire it is.
The tuxedo was too obvious... even the H2 vampire had a somewhat modified one. The idea was for his clothes to have elements that evoke that type of thing, not to wear a modern suit.Rion wrote: You mean like the tuxedo wearing Vampires of H4? Because I weren't weren't too happy with that.
Don't worry, i'm sure one day you'll improve your tastes.Rion wrote:I can't really say I either remember or miss anything whimsy about Heroes. While I've played H2 at a friend's place a long time ago, my own first Heroes game was H3.
And H3 had the vampire from Nosferatu...
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
The fact that he wears armour and uses a sword?ThunderTitan wrote:And what does that have to do with what he's wearing?!Rion wrote: I didn't mean that specific armour (though agree that it's too red), but more that what kind of Vampire it is.
Still, I don't think a tuxedolike outfit fits in a fantasy world.The tuxedo was too obvious... even the H2 vampire had a somewhat modified one. The idea was for his clothes to have elements that evoke that type of thing, not to wear a modern suit.Rion wrote: You mean like the tuxedo wearing Vampires of H4? Because I weren't weren't too happy with that.
Don't worry, i'm sure one day you'll improve your tastes.Rion wrote:I can't really say I either remember or miss anything whimsy about Heroes. While I've played H2 at a friend's place a long time ago, my own first Heroes game was H3.
And H3 had the vampire from Nosferatu...[/quote]
What do you mean "improve my tastes"? I'm pretty sure opinions are subjective and that your view on Vampires isn't objectively better mine.
Please inform me if my sentences contains grammatical mistakes.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
How is that a type of vampire?! Might as well say a pikemen and a swordmen are different types of men.Rion wrote: The fact that he wears armour and uses a sword?
I was thinking that you where talking about him being a martial like vampire, and not his equipment.
Works fine for that BB vampire (anachronistic shades notwithstanding).Still, I don't think a tuxedolike outfit fits in a fantasy world.
Just because opinions can be subjective doesn't mean one opinion can't be objectively better then another. And an opinion can be supported with objective reasoning btw.Rion wrote: What do you mean "improve my tastes"? I'm pretty sure opinions are subjective and that your view on Vampires isn't objectively better mine.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
In homm 2 enitre necromacers faction was cartoonish non serious style(196x year horror style mumies/zombies) so serious portrayal of vampire would just ruin the mood. In homm4 hoverer Bela Lugosi style vampire really jumps out of line considering overall style of game. Must admit it is one of few models that are decently animated though.
Must admit that wow death knights/LOK/anime vampires bit too much dominate vampire style in modern games, but what you gonna do.
Must admit that wow death knights/LOK/anime vampires bit too much dominate vampire style in modern games, but what you gonna do.
That is what I mean. That he is martial Vampire, who is willing or even likes to fight, rather than the more Victorian Vampire.ThunderTitan wrote: How is that a type of vampire?! Might as well say a pikemen and a swordmen are different types of men.
I was thinking that you where talking about him being a martial like vampire, and not his equipment.
I guess I have a different view on fantasy than you.Works fine for that BB vampire (anachronistic shades notwithstanding).
I know that, but are you seriously saying that Vampires styled as Victorian gentlemen are objectively better Vampires styled as medieval noblemen?Just because opinions can be subjective doesn't mean one opinion can't be objectively better then another. And an opinion can be supported with objective reasoning btw.
Please inform me if my sentences contains grammatical mistakes.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Best protection money can buy in a magical world would not be armour...Soronarr wrote:Expensive things are expensive. Best protection money can buy will ALWAYS be expensive.ThunderTitan wrote: In a land where magic is commonplace i doubt that it would be as expensive as in RL.
Unless magic does away with economy and human nature.....
And you don't get how economy works, necessary stuff like armour in a time when such an object is still a necessity would go down in price fast once it becomes easier to make...
Your comparing them wrong, it's not that Victorian nobles weren't into fighting, they just didn't wear bulky armour that made them slower (for obvious reason, and actually medieval nobles didn't either unless they where on a horse, remember Richard the 3rd, "My kingdom for a horse!" and all that). And Vampires benefit from speed more then armour. Plus, the BB vamp does have armour on, a cuirass i believe.Rion wrote:That is what I mean. That he is martial Vampire, who is willing or even likes to fight, rather than the more Victorian Vampire.
I know that, but are you seriously saying that Vampires styled as Victorian gentlemen are objectively better Vampires styled as medieval noblemen?
And making light armoured vampires that evoke pop-culture in subtle ways is objectively better for entertainment then just making a knight with fangs...
Neither Heroes nor WH was ever a "serious" fantasy setting... and while they should never become too farcical making them serious betrays their roots.I guess I have a different view on fantasy than you.
Let's keep knight with fangs where they belong.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
Actually an increased armor demand combined with low production capabilities will unavoidably mean increased prices. As far as we know, the humans in Ashan use the regular blacksmiths to forge armors, the blacksmiths on the other hand need iron ore (which is extracted in quite conventional way, otherwise we wouldn't have mines in the game), which on the other hand is gathered with medieval slowness. All this inevitably makes the plate mails expensive, no matter how many magicians you have around.ThunderTitan wrote:And you don't get how economy works, necessary stuff like armour in a time when such an object is still a necessity would go down in price fast once it becomes easier to make...
Also, even if the humans can cheaply train fully armored infantry en masse, they still wouldn't do it because every old-school army needs a contingent of light troops that can maneuver easily and thus provide tactical flexibility. You can't have a fighting force of 100% shock troops, it just wouldn't be effective enough.
Then what would it be? Air?ThunderTitan wrote:Soronarr wrote: Best protection money can buy in a magical world would not be armour...
And you don't get how economy works, necessary stuff like armour in a time when such an object is still a necessity would go down in price fast once it becomes easier to make...
You assume magic is limitless, boundless. If that were so, mages would rule over everything. There are limits - the amount of mine, spell casting time, how draining a spell is for a caster or what a spell can do for that matter.
And we're talking middle ages here. Factories and mass production didn't exist.
A single plate mail could take months to complete. And price doesn't go down when a object is highly coveted - it goes UP.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Depends on the type of item... and that's high-school level economics.Soronarr wrote: And price doesn't go down when a object is highly coveted - it goes UP.
Lowering the price of a highly coveted item means more people can afford to buy it, which means you can make more money overall from selling it instead of making more money from individual sales.
Neither is a production line... it simply has a big advantage over other means of production because of how it does things in a more efficient wayYou assume magic is limitless, boundless. If that were so, mages would rule over everything. There are limits - the amount of mine, spell casting time, how draining a spell is for a caster or what a spell can do for that matter.
And Magic already has a big advantage over other ways to do stuff (otherwise it would be pointless)... way easier to wait a day or drink from a fountain to be able to replicate making fires hot enough to melt armour easy then having to gather coal, wait for the forge to heat up etc.
Actually we're not because the middle ages where a result of the fall of the Roman Empire... which lead to depopulation de-urbanization and barbarian invasions/migrations.And we're talking middle ages here.
Most fantasy settings are more like the classical era but with middle ages fashion. And of course some cultures where not actually affected by the middle ages as it was more of a Western Europe thing.
That's why i said "easier to make"! Pay attention.Zenofex wrote: Actually an increased armor demand combined with low production capabilities will unavoidably mean increased prices.
Because we don't have mines today.(which is extracted in quite conventional way, otherwise we wouldn't have mines in the game), which on the other hand is gathered with medieval slowness.
And actually medieval slowness is right, because in the classical age mining was probably more efficient.
Why would training more armoured troops = not being able to train any shock troops?!Also, even if the humans can cheaply train fully armored infantry en masse, they still wouldn't do it because every old-school army needs a contingent of light troops that can maneuver easily and thus provide tactical flexibility. You can't have a fighting force of 100% shock troops, it just wouldn't be effective enough.
Iron weapons where crappier then bronze ones (and steel came along way later then the start of the Iron Age) but as iron was more plentiful more people could be armed with them... and that's why iron replaced bronze and why all games that give you more dmg when you upgrade weapons from Bronze to Iron are wrong.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I am paying attention, but I don't understand why do you assume that the armors will become easier to make at any point in the future. I don't have the impression that the Ashan's humans economy, technology and pretty much everything is progressing, on the contrary - they are behaving like your regular narrow-minded medieval obscurantists.ThunderTitan wrote:That's why i said "easier to make"! Pay attention.
Where did I say that? Shock troop = armored troop in the medieval world.Why would training more armoured troops = not being able to train any shock troops?!
I can't see what the qualities of the metals have anything to do with the discussion. The weapons and armors of the human infantry/cavalry seem to be made of steel anyway (and the normal, medieval Western European plate armor that we are talking about is made of steel).Iron weapons where crappier then bronze ones (and steel came along way later then the start of the Iron Age) but as iron was more plentiful more people could be armed with them... and that's why iron replaced bronze and why all games that give you more dmg when you upgrade weapons from Bronze to Iron are wrong.
We do, but we don't use magic extract resources from there. As far as we can tell, neither did the people during the Middle Ages. And for all we know - the Ashan humans too.Because we don't have mines today.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
I wasn't, what i was saying is that the presence of magic (which is wide spread enough to be used in every battle and to make pretty light when screaming GRIFFIN ETERNAL!) should have quite an effect on how fast stuff gets done. But i guess Reed Richards is Useless will always be in effect.Zenofex wrote:
I am paying attention, but I don't understand why do you assume that the armors will become easier to make at any point in the future. I don't have the impression that the Ashan's humans economy, technology and pretty much everything is progressing, on the contrary - they are behaving like your regular narrow-minded medieval obscurantists.
Ashan won't actually do anything that makes any kind of sense for sure... it simply doesn't work that way.
Eh: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_troopsZenofex wrote: Where did I say that? Shock troop = armored troop in the medieval world.[/size]
Notice the part about mobility?!
But feel free to replace that with light troops if you want.
Zenofex wrote: I can't see what the qualities of the metals have anything to do with the discussion. The weapons and armors of the human infantry/cavalry seem to be made of steel anyway (and the normal, medieval Western European plate armor that we are talking about is made of steel).
[/size]
It doesn't, it was an example of how increased production would work to whoever does it advantage... and how making weapons easier happened in RL way before the middle ages too.
We use technology... because we don't have any magic.Zenofex wrote: We do, but we don't use magic extract resources from there. As far as we can tell, neither did the people during the Middle Ages. And for all we know - the Ashan humans too.[/size]
They do, so it would be like if we still mined by hand while we had the same level of tech we do now.
One example of what the best protection would be is actually artifacts... sure, they're still armour, but not really normal armour that would presumably be what the troops are wearing, and most likely enchanted etc.Soronarr wrote: Then what would it be? Air?
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest