Helmet of Legend

[LongDarkBlues]

Or maybe it's how beneficial offensive spells cast on him are? Or, if it also applies to Special Abilities, maybe abilities can be improved through Hero stats that affect Magic Power? That would be pretty cool.

[Infiltrator]

Precision spell, perhaps?

How should I know?

[GreatEmerald]

Precision spell, perhaps?

Or maybe Blur

[Neidhaart]

Epic quality artifact?

[Variol]

I think the items in the game(s) are one of the most fun parts. I'm really looking forward to lots of new stuff!

[ThunderTitan]

Bigger init stats mean you can differentiate better between creatures while keeping them in the same relative init tier, so i'm not against it...

I just hope they don't do a repeat og H5's init values that meant some units never got to move enough to count.

[Infiltrator]

I just hope they don't do a repeat og H5's init values that meant some units never got to move enough to count.

I heard that units now act once per turn, with initiative determining the order.

[ThunderTitan]

I heard that units now act once per turn, with initiative determining the order.

Yeah, but that doesn't mean you won't have some units with too low or too high init... and the 2nd part was just making sure people understood what was wrong with H5's system.

[Mirez]

There was nothing wrong with the system, nival should've used a little bit more carefully though. Especially considering how easy it was to get mass haste/slow or both.

[ThunderTitan]

So there was nothing wrong with it besides the stuff that was wrong...

[Mirez]

yes exactly

[ThunderTitan]

Well i do agree that the idea behind it isn't bad, they just got the numbers wrong, leading too some units being way to slow compared to others... haste and slow just exacerbated that even more.

[Mirez]

Which is basically what I said just now..

[ThunderTitan]

Or did you?!

[hellegennes]

Saying "NOTHING wrong" and "except for" in the same sentence makes no sense. Especially when the "except for" part is made up of more than one points.

[Mirez]

Or did you?!

yes

Saying "NOTHING wrong" and "except for" in the same sentence makes no sense. Especially when the "except for" part is made up of more than one points.

yes but I didn't use the term "except for" so your grammar lesson was unasked for

[mr.hackcrag]

But where's hackcrag's helemet?

[oUcH]

Please stop with the balance discussions, you got jack **** on how the game actualy works.

[hellegennes]

yes but I didn't use the term "except for" so your grammar lesson was unasked for



It's not the actual term; don't get technical. It's the meaning. Where did you see a grammar lesson? Either way, if I was referring to the structure, it would have make it a syntax issue.

[Mirez]

yes but I didn't use the term "except for" so your grammar lesson was unasked for

It's not the actual term; don't get technical. It's the meaning. Where did you see a grammar lesson? Either way, if I was referring to the structure, it would have make it a syntax issue.

Even the structure wasn't like that. What I said was "There's nothing wrong about it, it should've been done differently" not "There's nothing wrong with it except the stuff that is wrong" like tt implied.

That said I don't feel like I need to defend my posts in terms of grammar so I'd like this topic to be about the screenshot.