H3: What Are the Best First Level Troops?

The old Heroes games developed by New World Computing. Please specify which game you are referring to in your post.

What Are Your Favorite 1st LvL Troops?

Pikemen and Halberdiers
8
13%
Troglodyte and their Infernal Kin
1
2%
Gnolls and Gnoll Marauders
1
2%
Imps and Familiars
1
2%
Imps and Familiars
1
2%
Skeletons and Skeleton Warriors
7
12%
Centaurs and their Captains
23
38%
Goblins and Hobgoblins
1
2%
Gremlins and Master Gremlins
9
15%
Pixies and Sprites
4
7%
Halflings
4
7%
 
Total votes: 60

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 02 Mar 2006, 19:53

Why did they replace the Halflings anyway?
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image

User avatar
Nucleon
Scout
Scout
Posts: 168
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Location: Québec, Meat Universe.

Unread postby Nucleon » 02 Mar 2006, 20:06

Gaidal Cain wrote:Yes, back when RoE was released, Tower heroes came with about 80 gremlins. Coupled with the fact that troops and movement points were reset when the hero fled, amassing huge amounts of gremlins became easy if you had some luck with what you had near your castle.
Uh-hu. Also, the early patches also limited the number of troops tavern heroes could get beyond the first pair, thus setting the deathblow of the famed "Gremlin Rush".
I just noticed something- the thread topic asks for best Level 1 creature, but the question above the poll asks about favourite. Since these aren't the same (I clearly wouldn't have voted Gnolls if it were for "best" creature), I would like to know which one is intended?
Eerr... yes, of course. Well, as "the best" is highly subjective, Nucleon think He should have stuck with "Your Favorite", going along with why is it so. Think of the title as simply a dishonest catch...

:proud:
(Translated from Silent Speak)

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 02 Mar 2006, 20:08

I'm pretty sure he can change the thread title by Editing his post.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image

User avatar
Nucleon
Scout
Scout
Posts: 168
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Location: Québec, Meat Universe.

Unread postby Nucleon » 02 Mar 2006, 20:16

If WoG's troop experience system is on, well there's no doubts that Centaurs are coming out of this as the indisputed winners; You see, the basic, brown ones can shoot as soon as they reach lvl6 -which takes no time at all with 1st lvl units. No contest here, althought the Pikemen with their "breath" attack reveal themselves quite useful too.

However, if we stick to non-WoG, SoD H3, Sprites are quite a deal: Cheap as mud, fast and no retaliation. Nucleon just wish they were as sexy as the pixies, but you can't have it all, right?

Hafling (more lkeable Gremlins, with increased luck), Gnolls (fast and tough) as well as Centaurs (for aformentionned reasons) are close seconds.
(Translated from Silent Speak)

Pacifist
Peasant
Peasant
Posts: 92
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby Pacifist » 03 Mar 2006, 07:40

I voted halberdiers. They are only one square and are very sturdy in melee. The advantage of speed of the centaurs is compensated by their better defence and the fact that they are more difficult to surround if they put themselves in a corner (allowing them to beat greater armies). Well there is no general situation, so I just voted for preference :)

User avatar
DaemianLucifer
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 11282
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: City 17

Unread postby DaemianLucifer » 03 Mar 2006, 07:58

Nucleon wrote:Cheap as mud, fast and no retaliation..
You are paying for your mud? :| Maybe in form of earth elementals.BUt those are more expensive then sprites,so.. :devil:

User avatar
Nucleon
Scout
Scout
Posts: 168
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Location: Québec, Meat Universe.

Unread postby Nucleon » 03 Mar 2006, 14:38

Pacifist wrote:I voted halberdiers. They are only one square and are very sturdy in melee. The advantage of speed of the centaurs is compensated by their better defence and the fact that they are more difficult to surround if they put themselves in a corner (allowing them to beat greater armies). Well there is no general situation, so I just voted for preference :)
That's an interesting point of view, few people are bringing it.

Nucleon thinks that "two squares" creatures are better suited for defense (because they cover more angle protecting shooters), but disavantaged in attack, where they sometime have trouble squeezing throught.
(Translated from Silent Speak)

User avatar
Vlad976
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2779
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Baseship #640

Unread postby Vlad976 » 03 Mar 2006, 14:43

vote Halflings
Because. :D
Simmons: I think you’re asking me if these computers store all the data on Red and Blue armies?
Sarge: Control Alt Bingo.

User avatar
LordHoborgXVII
Scout
Scout
Posts: 190
Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Location: USA

Unread postby LordHoborgXVII » 03 Mar 2006, 22:17

I'd have to go for the skellies. Although they tend to die like flies, the fact that you can amass huge numbers of them makes them quite useful. Gremlins are useful due to their ranged attack, but I usually find them to be less survivable. Goblins and gnolls are strictly meat shields, as are imps. Pikemen and Centaurs are also some of my favorite level ones, because they are sturdy enough to survive fairly well, and can deal decent damage. Pikemen especially are quite useful in the early stages of the game.
Happy Millenium!

User avatar
kitcat0
Scout
Scout
Posts: 182
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Location: estonian in Denmark

Unread postby kitcat0 » 04 Mar 2006, 09:32

Sprites - fast and no retal.

User avatar
Black Ghost
Conscript
Conscript
Posts: 219
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby Black Ghost » 04 Mar 2006, 11:49

Centaut chieftain rulez

Pikeman is a bit stronger, but too slow to be #1. Centaur and Upg. Centaurs are my favourite, and once again Rampart seemes to be my favourite and best fraction... :)

Gljivko a.k.a Vortex
Peasant
Peasant
Posts: 83
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Astral plane, occasionally on Earth

Unread postby Gljivko a.k.a Vortex » 04 Mar 2006, 15:25

Voted for gremlins -> master gremlins

IMO, the best lvl 1 creature upgrade, especially useful on small maps. It really helped me on map Elbow Room on impossible difficulty, hire few tower heroes and upgrade workshop is cheesy but helpful tactic B-)

User avatar
SmokingBarrel
Peasant
Peasant
Posts: 66
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby SmokingBarrel » 05 Mar 2006, 01:18

I voted trogs and their infernal kin. Looks good man, like their weapons, how they die...

There are halflings? Can't recall...since when are there halflings in heroes 3?

User avatar
ThunderTitan
Perpetual Poster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 23271
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Now/here
Contact:

Unread postby ThunderTitan » 05 Mar 2006, 01:57

SmokingBarrel wrote:I voted trogs and their infernal kin. Looks good man, like their weapons, how they die...

There are halflings? Can't recall...since when are there halflings in heroes 3?
AB added them as neutrals. They looked like crap. Damn Gremlins...
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti

Alt-0128: €

Image

User avatar
Banedon
Round Table Knight
Round Table Knight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby Banedon » 05 Mar 2006, 03:56

wimfrits wrote:In the original game, new tower heroes started with like 60 gremlins. In small maps, tower could buy an additional hero, upgrade the workshop and start off towards an opponent with about 150 master gremlins. There's little any side could do about that.
They can! Inferno can built the Fire Lake (and upgrade it) wherupon 2 Efreet Sultans would be more than enough to annihilate 150 Master Gremlins. Stronghold can do the same with Thunderbirds, Rampart and Castle can rely on their own Ranged stacks, Dungeon can use their spells...

User avatar
Gaidal Cain
Round Table Hero
Round Table Hero
Posts: 6972
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Location: Solna

Unread postby Gaidal Cain » 05 Mar 2006, 07:37

Change the 150 for 500 gremlins then... The gremlin rush was based on rehiring heroes, not just hiring them...
You don't want to make enemies in Nuclear Engineering. -- T. Pratchett

User avatar
wimfrits
Round Table Knight
Round Table Knight
Posts: 2050
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands

Unread postby wimfrits » 05 Mar 2006, 11:03

Gaidal Cain wrote:Change the 150 for 500 gremlins then... The gremlin rush was based on rehiring heroes, not just hiring them...
I completely forgot that. They fixed both, right? Less starting gremlins (30+) for a new hero and only 1 unit for rehired fled heroes.
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

Pacifist
Peasant
Peasant
Posts: 92
Joined: 06 Jan 2006

Unread postby Pacifist » 05 Mar 2006, 11:06

The other factions could do the same thing too. The marksman+pikeman rush, the trog rush, the squeletton transformer rush, the grand-elves rush, etc,...
It only comes to a question of balance of starting troops. If it was imbalanced before the fixes, then it's still imballanced now. I simulated a gremlin rush vs a castle (master gremlins+ obsidian gargoyles vs halberdiers + marksman) . The castle won after 4 weeks growth. Everything depends on battle tactics, the master gremlins are very bad at melee. A tactician can block them in 2 turns, then it's easy. Numbers favor the best creatures (in this case the halberdiers).
It was good it was fixed but it was not really necessary.

edit: sorry I didn't count the fact that there were more gremlins before the fix. My simulation is not relevant then. But I still think that could be countered (and I did it on some occasions).

Gljivko a.k.a Vortex
Peasant
Peasant
Posts: 83
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Astral plane, occasionally on Earth

Unread postby Gljivko a.k.a Vortex » 05 Mar 2006, 11:36

Pacifist wrote:The other factions could do the same thing too. The marksman+pikeman rush, the trog rush, the squeletton transformer rush, the grand-elves rush, etc,...
In that case, let us not forget about some high lvl units rush, i. e. wyvern rush (I think they can be built at second day) and behemoth rush (built at 3rd day) ;)
So if we look carefully, every faction can (in some way) provide a rush tactic, though it varies in a way of resource requierment/management.

User avatar
wimfrits
Round Table Knight
Round Table Knight
Posts: 2050
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands

Unread postby wimfrits » 05 Mar 2006, 12:19

Pacifist wrote:edit: sorry I didn't count the fact that there were more gremlins before the fix. My simulation is not relevant then. But I still think that could be countered (and I did it on some occasions).
Sure. But if 2 equally skilled players meet early game and 1 of them is using the gremlin-rush strategy, I think that player on average will have the advantage.

The 50% decrease in tower starting army of the fix should implicate that either the before- or after situation was imbalanced.
I think both are imbalanced. Too strong before the fix and too weak after..
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?


Return to “Heroes I-IV”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest