Fog of War where are you?
- Mutare Drake
- Scout
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 07 Jan 2006
As a diehard wargamer, I liked FOW. The "hunt the little peeps" issue would
fade if factions surrendered once their army/hero strength dropped below a
certain point (either on a player-by-player basis or overall, like in Warlords).
Since my chance of buying H5, given other info, currently hovers around
5%, the lack of FOW is rather irrelevant at this point for me.
fade if factions surrendered once their army/hero strength dropped below a
certain point (either on a player-by-player basis or overall, like in Warlords).
Since my chance of buying H5, given other info, currently hovers around
5%, the lack of FOW is rather irrelevant at this point for me.
- Infiltrator
- CH Staff
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
- Infiltrator
- CH Staff
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Thelonious
- Round Table Knight
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: right behind the next one
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
Big diference in rules.Rules in HoMM and in civ are similar in realism.And scouting the map is almost identical in these two games:You move your army every turn for a number of spaces,and it reveals the land depending on its LoS.Infiltrator wrote:Last time I checked this was the Heroes 5 forum. What you are saying is "Hey in Quake you can survive a 50 meter fall, let's add that to Splinter Cell because it's so cool in Quake".
- Infiltrator
- CH Staff
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- chaosgorgon
- Peasant
- Posts: 82
- Joined: 02 Feb 2006
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
- IceCold2000
- Leprechaun
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 10 Jan 2006
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Thelonious
- Round Table Knight
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: right behind the next one
- Infiltrator
- CH Staff
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
It does go better with RTS, your remark would be valid if I said that Heroes and Civ were comparable, but I actually said the opossite. I guess you have the "jump-to-conclusions" diseasechaosgorgon wrote:wohoooo, but ur argument is that fow goes better with RTS!!!, ha, guess that u have the psico-disease "i hate H4"
But yes, I do hate Heroes 4, even though I tried to like it, I really did
Ah.. really? So... Age of wonders? TBS.. FoW. Warlords? TBS... FoW.Infiltrator wrote:The FoW that restores itself belongs in the RTS genre, heroes is good with what we've got now, imo.
Lords of the Realm? TBS.. FoW again... Master of Orion.. TBS.. FoW
These are just the first the came into my mind.
- Infiltrator
- CH Staff
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
- Infiltrator
- CH Staff
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
All I have to say to you is that every succesful TBS that I can think of has FoW, H3 does not have it just because it's very old and at that time FoW was not so common as of now. FoW has lots of benefits for a strategy game be they RTS or TBS, while it has no downside ( apart from making the game a bit harder, but those that want an easier game can always turn it off )Infiltrator wrote:The TBS genre, unlike the RTS/FPS isn't filled with cookie cutter games. That's all I have to say to you.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 3 guests