Crossbowman evolution
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
Crossbowman evolution
Well,there was archer evolution,and now heres the other part.Which one is the best?
NOTE:I see now that I forgot to add the ranger in the previous archer evolution poll,but it would be quite dumb to have it among crossbowmen.And,as they are very similar to the original archer,it wont be a big loss not to have them.And,if you disagree,well,tough luck
Heroes of Might and Magic 3 marksman:
Heroes of Might and Magic 4 crossbowman:
Heroes of Might and Magic 5 crossbowman:
NOTE:I see now that I forgot to add the ranger in the previous archer evolution poll,but it would be quite dumb to have it among crossbowmen.And,as they are very similar to the original archer,it wont be a big loss not to have them.And,if you disagree,well,tough luck
Heroes of Might and Magic 3 marksman:
Heroes of Might and Magic 4 crossbowman:
Heroes of Might and Magic 5 crossbowman:
- Gaidal Cain
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 6972
- Joined: 26 Nov 2005
- Location: Solna
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
H4, even if they have a stupid colour scheme. In H5 both the archers and marksman have way too much armour, and the H3 one is kinda mediocre.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
-
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Damn, no sprite evolution this week! Those creatures look great in any homm. It would have been a good contest.
DL, don't you usually get upset when others don't do creature polls "properly"?
I also don't understand how this poll is different than the other archer poll. A grand elf poll would have been more fitting so long as we're doing "archer" like creatures.
Oh well... It's a tough choice between 3 and 5, but I think I'll go with 5 considering I've never voted for a H5 monster, and this one is pretty good.
H4 looks like the archers are millionaires. Such fancy cloths...
I also can't see their faces to good, but for some reason, they remind me of vikings. Maybe it's just because it's too hard for my poor eyes to notice them up close.
DL, don't you usually get upset when others don't do creature polls "properly"?
I also don't understand how this poll is different than the other archer poll. A grand elf poll would have been more fitting so long as we're doing "archer" like creatures.
Oh well... It's a tough choice between 3 and 5, but I think I'll go with 5 considering I've never voted for a H5 monster, and this one is pretty good.
H4 looks like the archers are millionaires. Such fancy cloths...
I also can't see their faces to good, but for some reason, they remind me of vikings. Maybe it's just because it's too hard for my poor eyes to notice them up close.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
As opossed to the ton of armour the H5 one was on?!mr.hackcrag wrote: H4 looks like the archers are millionaires. Such fancy cloths...
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
-
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
Of course Im upset!Ive missed a ranger in my previous poll.But I made that one ages ago,and theres no way I can redo it now.Besides,I wanted at least one poll in which HV can win,and thats why I made the archer evolutionmr.hackcrag wrote: DL, don't you usually get upset when others don't do creature polls "properly"?
As for the sprites,make them next week.Im not going to make another evolution unless there happens to be a monday with no evolutions before 23:00,forum time
- Zombie_Inc
- Pixie
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Israel
-
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Don't hold your breath. Now that H2 is out of the way and won't steal any votes, I bet H3 will still end up winning this one. It'll be a cold day in the infernal pits known as Serbia, before H5 ever reaches the calibur of H2 and H3. Gwua-ha-ha! H2 FOREVER!DaemianLucifer wrote:I wanted at least one poll in which HV can win,and thats why I made the archer evolutionmr.hackcrag wrote: DL, don't you usually get upset when others don't do creature polls "properly"?
- DaemianLucifer
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 11282
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: City 17
No,what I meant is that I made the archer poll so that HV can win.The crossbowmen one is just like a continuation to it,but it doesnt endanger the win of HV archer,one of the rare good looking units in HV.mr.hackcrag wrote: Don't hold your breath. Now that H2 is out of the way and won't steal any votes, I bet H3 will still end up winning this one. It'll be a cold day in the infernal pits known as Serbia, before H5 ever reaches the calibur of H2 and H3. Gwua-ha-ha! H2 FOREVER!
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Gold sucks as armour. Plus armour was very expensive back then, and more of a burden to an archer.mr.hackcrag wrote:At least the armor isn't made of gold.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Actualy crossbows use bolts, not arrows. And an armoured crossbowman on a horse isn't such a bad ideea. But cavalry is prob better.Meandor wrote:H3- where are his arrows?
H5- what next? Crossbowman with heavy armor on horse? Or elephant?
H4- looks like crossbowman with arrows so i vote for him.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
-
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006
I wasn't suggesting it was good armor. And wasn't armor provided to troops by the military? I didn't realize each individual had to buy it themselves.ThunderTitan wrote:Gold sucks as armour. Plus armour was very expensive back then, and more of a burden to an archer.mr.hackcrag wrote:At least the armor isn't made of gold.
- ThunderTitan
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 23271
- Joined: 06 Jan 2006
- Location: Now/here
- Contact:
Protection, speed and range. How effective it would be in an actual battle i have no ideea though.Meandor wrote:Care to explain?And an armoured crossbowman on a horse isn't such a bad ideea.
Not always. Actualy not most of the time. Armour, or at least the good kind was more of a nobles thing. There probably were troops that had the honour of getting armour and stuff, but it wasn't exactly common. And seeing as kings usually borrowed money of individuals (most anti-jew stuff was a way to get rid of the debt) i doubt they would have had enough money to equip a whole army, and like said before, that much armour would be counter-productive on archers.I wasn't suggesting it was good armor. And wasn't armor provided to troops by the military? I didn't realize each individual had to buy it themselves.
Disclaimer: May contain sarcasm!
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
I have never faked a sarcasm in my entire life. - ???
"With ABC deleting dynamite gags from cartoons, do you find that your children are using explosives less frequently?" — Mark LoPresti
Alt-0128: €
-
- Round Table Hero
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006
- dallasmavs41
- Demon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: 14 Mar 2006
- Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests